Quality System Map
Metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Diagram title | Quality System Map |
| Related chapter | Chapter 6 — Systems Thinking for Quality Engineers |
| Part | Part I — Foundations of Modern Software Quality Engineering |
| MQE-BOK domain | Domain 1 — Foundations of Modern Software Quality Engineering |
| Diagram type | System relationship map |
| Skill level | Foundation |
| Model status | Original MSQE Educational Model; not an industry-standard architecture notation |
| Version | 0.1.0 |
| Status | Draft |
| Author | MSQE Project |
| Last updated | 2026-08-08 |
Purpose
Give Quality Engineers a repeatable way to widen a discussion from a feature to the system conditions that shape a user outcome. The map supports system-level reasoning about interactions, dependencies, operation, and feedback.
Learning Objectives
After studying this diagram, the reader should be able to:
- identify the system layers and relationships relevant to a customer outcome; and
- trace how feedback from operation can change earlier decisions.
Diagram Source
This Mermaid representation follows the original MSQE Quality System Map defined in Chapter 6. It is a discussion lens, not a strict linear architecture or a replacement for formal modelling techniques.
Diagram
flowchart TB
Users[Users and customer outcomes]
Interfaces[Interfaces: UI, APIs, events, contracts]
Services[Services and business capabilities]
Data[Data: state, integrity, privacy, consistency]
Infrastructure[Infrastructure: compute, network, storage, identity, configuration]
Dependencies[Dependencies: teams, providers, shared platforms, contracts]
Operations[Operations: deploy, observe, support, secure, recover]
Feedback[Feedback: signals, customer evidence, incidents, reviews]
Users --> Interfaces --> Services --> Data
Services --> Infrastructure
Data --> Infrastructure
Interfaces --> Dependencies
Services --> Dependencies
Infrastructure --> Dependencies
Infrastructure --> Operations
Dependencies --> Operations
Operations --> Feedback
Feedback -. informs .-> Users
Feedback -. informs .-> Interfaces
Feedback -. informs .-> Services
Feedback -. informs .-> Data
Feedback -. informs .-> Infrastructure
Textual Interpretation and Accessibility
Begin with users and the outcome they need. Interfaces carry the flow to services, which use data and infrastructure. Dependencies influence interfaces, services, and infrastructure; operations deploys, observes, supports, secures, and recovers the system. Feedback from signals, users, incidents, and reviews informs earlier layers. The diagram is intentionally not a linear architecture: its additional dependency and feedback arrows highlight interactions a component-only view can miss.
Component Description
| Map layer | Question it prompts |
|---|---|
| Users | What outcome matters, who can be harmed, and how will failure be perceived? |
| Interfaces and services | Which flows, contracts, business capabilities, and failure semantics shape the outcome? |
| Data and infrastructure | Which state, configuration, capacity, identity, and consistency conditions support the flow? |
| Dependencies and operations | Which suppliers, teams, response paths, and recovery conditions affect the outcome? |
| Feedback | Which evidence changes a future design or delivery decision? |
Related Chapters
- Chapter 4 — Quality Throughout the Software Development Lifecycle
- Chapter 5 — Shift Left, Shift Right & Shift Everywhere
- Chapter 9 — The Modern Software Quality Engineering Framework
Diagram Review Checklist
- The model is labelled as an MSQE educational model.
- Relationships do not imply a fixed system architecture.
- The Mermaid source and textual interpretation provide an accessible alternative.