Illustrative PR/MR Description

This template is a learning artifact. Replace all placeholders with evidence from your own branch; do not represent it as actual repository history.

Purpose

Implements a small Quality Engineering Toolkit that validates fictional execution evidence, derives a quality summary, and persists a structured report.

Review Focus

• Is every JSON boundary validated before values are trusted?
• Is de-duplication conservative enough to preserve evidence integrity?
• Does maxAttempts clearly mean total attempts, including the first call?
• Are only explicitly classified dependency failures retried?
• Could any public diagnostic disclose a raw caught cause?
• Do tests establish the timeout, retry, and report-output behaviour without real waiting?

Validation Evidence

[replace with the exact commands and results from your environment]
npm run check
npm run build
npm test
npm start

Known Limitations and Residual Risk

• This version uses local fixtures and simulated dependencies only.
• A production integration would require an explicit data contract, authentication model, privacy review, observability design, and operational ownership.

Suggested Reviewers

• A TypeScript reviewer for the runtime trust boundaries.
• A Quality Engineer for evidence semantics and reporting decisions.
• A maintainer familiar with the target dependency for retry and idempotency assumptions.